Questions Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 26

Questions - Assignment Example tion or Nursing could use the Internet to search for jobs through online recruitment agencies and through the official websites of organizations where candidates intend to apply. Some organizations even encourage sending of resumes online to facilitate the job screening process. Only those applications who meet the qualifications of the organizations are called for interview and eventual placement. 2) Sometimes in technical writing, it is necessary to categorize or group elements into appropriate categories. There are three techniques for categorizing: classification, division, and partition. Please explain what each of these means and why it is advantageous. Classification means grouping elements according to similar characteristics. As emphasized, â€Å"classification is the act of locating a specimen of all the different kinds of objects that possess a given characteristic or characteristics† (Nikko par. 4). The advantage of using classification is to highlight the presentation of items into a more structured manner. It is also revealed that â€Å"classification answers the question: What are the main types or kinds of this group of things? Division answers the question: What are the parts or characteristics that make up this single thing?† (Duncan 1). Thus, the advantage of division is providing additional details on the things that were initially classified. Further, partition means â€Å"the act of dividing a unit into its components. The parts do not have necessarily had anything in common beyond the fact that they belong to the same unit† (Nikko par. 8). The technique of partition is beneficial in terms of pr oviding information on the parts of the object or item that was previously identified under the division

A reflection paper on a book chapter Research Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

A reflection on a book chapter - Research Paper Example The traditional approach of making comparison in relation to politics employed speculative and normative tools, with Aristotle leading in that pursuit. This comparison made up the pre-modern comparative politics. While the specific start of modernity remains a diverse debate, comparative politics in the modern times dates back to the emergence of various social science disciplines like sociology and political science (Caramani, 2008; Ch.1). Following this, political science is regarded as a young professional practice due to the fact that modernity is associated with the 21st Century. On the other hand, post-modernism is seemingly an upgrade of classical modernity. In this case, political comparisons are systematic and clearly organized, thus the argument that post-modernism is a stage within the process of modernity. This whole pursuit cannot fail to importantly account for political influence across the identified three periods prior to modernity. Contributions towards comparative politics are diverse and dynamic. History has it that many historians and modernists have the shaped comparative politics over time. The highlighted individuals in Chapter One; The Evolution of Comparative Politics are just but a few who have significantly contributed towards the evaluation and assessment of comparative politics throughout pre-modern, modern and post-modern times (Caramani, 2008; Ch.1). Although political undertakings are one of the most volatile practices in the contemporary world, the ideas, concepts and theories aired in the chapter are still relevant. The contemporary times in political context can be said to be modern in nature and paving way to post-modernism. Systematic comparisons of political aspects are evident today, with key players in the political field drawing relevant political concepts from political experts of the past. Therefore, the applicability of political comparisons in current times remains a significant